Perceptions of Female Performance Athletes in Relation to Demographic and Sporting Characteristics

Savaş Ayhan1, Ercan Ti̇zar1, Ramazan Erdoğan2
1Dicle University School of Physical Education and Sports, Diyarbakır/Türkiye
2Munzur University Faculty of Sports Sciences, Tunceli/Türkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624165
Published: 15/10/2026
: Savaş Ayhan, Ercan Ti̇zar, Ramazan Erdoğan. Perceptions of Female Performance Athletes in Relation to Demographic and Sporting Characteristics. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1975-1985.

Abstract

This study investigated perceptions of female performance athletes among 130 volunteer women enrolled at the School of Physical Education and Sports, Dicle University, and examined whether scale scores varied by demographic characteristics and sporting background. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was used. Participants completed a personal information form and the 23-item Perception Scale for Female Performance Athletes developed by Kurşun et al. [1], which examines cultural value judgments, integration through social support, and body image. Importantly, the original instrument was validated primarily as a measure of spectators’ perceptions of female athletes, rather than a measure of an athlete’s own sporting performance. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and one-way analyses of variance were used, with statistical significance assessed at p < 0.05. The reported overall scale mean was 3.09 (SD = 0.31) on a five-point response scale. Recalculation of the independent-samples comparisons from the rounded group statistics indicated differences by sport type in the body image subscale (approximately p = 0.004) and total score (approximately p = 0.011), with higher reported means among team-sport participants. National-athlete status was also associated with a higher total score in the original analysis (reported p = 0.02). However, previously reported significant differences between amateur and professional participants were not reproduced from the available group summaries; those test statistics require confirmation using the original dataset. Comparisons by age, height, and body weight were not statistically significant in the reported analyses. These findings should be interpreted as differences in attitudes toward female performance athletes, not as direct evidence of differences in self-rated athletic performance. Because the instrument was originally validated in a different respondent population, its measurement properties in this sample and the statistical discrepancies should be addressed before definitive conclusions are drawn. The study may inform future inquiry into how sporting participation and competitive experience relate to perceptions of female athletes, provided the findings are confirmed with fully documented and appropriately validated analyses.

Keywords: female athletes, perceptions of women in sport, body image, sport type, national-athlete status

Abstract

This study investigated perceptions of female performance athletes among 130 volunteer women enrolled at the School of Physical Education and Sports, Dicle University, and examined whether scale scores varied by demographic characteristics and sporting background. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was used. Participants completed a personal information form and the 23-item Perception Scale for Female Performance Athletes developed by Kurşun et al. [1], which examines cultural value judgments, integration through social support, and body image. Importantly, the original instrument was validated primarily as a measure of spectators’ perceptions of female athletes, rather than a measure of an athlete’s own sporting performance. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and one-way analyses of variance were used, with statistical significance assessed at p < 0.05. The reported overall scale mean was 3.09 (SD = 0.31) on a five-point response scale. Recalculation of the independent-samples comparisons from the rounded group statistics indicated differences by sport type in the body image subscale (approximately p = 0.004) and total score (approximately p = 0.011), with higher reported means among team-sport participants. National-athlete status was also associated with a higher total score in the original analysis (reported p = 0.02). However, previously reported significant differences between amateur and professional participants were not reproduced from the available group summaries; those test statistics require confirmation using the original dataset. Comparisons by age, height, and body weight were not statistically significant in the reported analyses. These findings should be interpreted as differences in attitudes toward female performance athletes, not as direct evidence of differences in self-rated athletic performance. Because the instrument was originally validated in a different respondent population, its measurement properties in this sample and the statistical discrepancies should be addressed before definitive conclusions are drawn. The study may inform future inquiry into how sporting participation and competitive experience relate to perceptions of female athletes, provided the findings are confirmed with fully documented and appropriately validated analyses.

Keywords: female athletes, perceptions of women in sport, body image, sport type, national-athlete status

References

  1. Kurşun, Ezgi, Nezaket Bilge Uzun, and Hüseyin Gümüş. “Perception Scale for Female Performance Athletes: Validity and Reliability Study (Kadın Performans Sporcularına Yönelik Algı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik çalışması).” Journal of Human Sciences, vol. 20, no. 3, 2023, pp. 375–86. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v20i3.6358

  2. Ajilchi, Bita, et al. “Applying Mindfulness Training to Enhance the Mental Toughness and Emotional Intelligence of Amateur Basketball Players.” Australasian Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 3, 2019, pp. 291–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856219828119

  3. Aslan, Mecbure, and Selen Doğan. “Dışsal motivasyon, içsel motivasyon ve performans etkileşimine kuramsal bir bakış.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 26, 2020, pp. 291–301. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.638479

  4. Bloom, Gordon A., and Todd M. Loughead. “Current Developments in North American Sport and Exercise Psychology: Team Building in Sport.” Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y del Deporte, vol. 6, no. 2, 2011, pp. 237–49. https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/7849

  5. Barker, Jamie B., et al. “The Effectiveness of Psychological Skills Training and Behavioral Interventions in Sport Using Single-Case Designs: A Meta Regression Analysis of the Peer-Reviewed Studies.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 51, 2020, article 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101746

  6. Holland, Mark J. G., et al. “Mental Qualities and Employed Mental Techniques of Young Elite Team Sport Athletes.” Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010, pp. 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.4.1.19

  7. Nicholls, Adam R., and Remco C. J. Polman. “Coping in Sport: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 25, no. 1, 2007, pp. 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600630654

  8. Portenga, Steven T., et al. “Helping to Build a Profession: A Working Definition of Sport and Performance Psychology.” Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017, pp. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2016.1227413

  9. Röthlin, Philipp, et al. “Psychological Skills Training and a Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Enhance Functional Athletic Performance: Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Ambulatory Assessment.” BMC Psychology, vol. 4, 2016, article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0147-y

  10. Storm, Louise K., et al. “Influential Relationships as Contexts of Learning and Becoming Elite: Athletes’ Retrospective Interpretations.” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, vol. 9, no. 6, 2014, pp. 1341–56. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.9.6.1341

  11. Karasar, Niyazi. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. 24th ed., Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2014.

  12. Büyüköztürk, Şener. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. 26th ed., Pegem Akademi, 2018. https://pegem.net/urun/Sosyal-Bilimler-icin-Veri-Analizi-El-Kitabi-Istatistik-Arastirma-Deseni-SPSS-Uygulamalari-ve-Yorum-61926

  13. Faul, Franz, et al. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 39, no. 2, 2007, pp. 175–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

  14. Faul, Franz, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 41, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1149–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

  15. George, Darren, and Paul Mallery. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update. 10th ed., Allyn & Bacon, 2010. https://books.google.com/books?id=KS1DPgAACAAJ

  16. Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed., Pearson, 2013. https://www.pearson.com/en-gb/subject-catalog/p/using-multivariate-statistics-pearson-new-international-edition/P200000005532/9781292021317

  17. Killham, Margo E., et al. “Women Athletes’ Self-Compassion, Self-Criticism, and Perceived Sport Performance.” Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, vol. 7, no. 3, 2018, pp. 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000127

  18. Abraldes, J. Arturo, et al. “A Cluster Analysis of High-Performance Female Team Players’ Perceived Motivational Climate: Implications on Perceived Motor Competence and Autonomous Behaviour.” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 12, 2022, article e0278572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278572

  19. Farah, Hummaira, et al. “Coaching Strategies and Sports Performance of Female Athletes.” THE SKY—International Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 13–28. https://doi.org/10.51846/the-sky.v5i1.1062

  20. Bird, Stephen P., et al. “Wellness, Mood, Sleep, and Performance in a Women’s National Basketball Team during International Competition.” Journal of Human Kinetics, vol. 96, special issue, 2025, pp. 163–75. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/200117

  21. Olmedilla, Aurelio, et al. “Competitive Psychological Disposition and Perception of Performance in Young Female Soccer Players.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019, article 1168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01168

  22. Laajili, Taysir, et al. “Self-Esteem, Wellbeing, and Health Status of Female Athletes in the Context of Sport Performance.” Women’s Health Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2025, pp. 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0119

  23. Noh, Young-Eun, et al. “The Impact of Religious–Psychological Factors on Self-Perceived Sport Performance among Religious Athletes in Malaysia.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 72, 2024, article 102612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102612

  24. Lervold, Kathrine, et al. “Exploration of Factors Predicting Sport Coaches’ Perceived Performance.” Sports, vol. 13, no. 3, 2025, article 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13030083

Savaş Ayhan
Dicle University School of Physical Education and Sports, Diyarbakır/Türkiye
Ercan Ti̇zar
Dicle University School of Physical Education and Sports, Diyarbakır/Türkiye
Ramazan Erdoğan
Munzur University Faculty of Sports Sciences, Tunceli/Türkiye

How to cite:

Savaş Ayhan, Ercan Ti̇zar, Ramazan Erdoğan. Perceptions of Female Performance Athletes in Relation to Demographic and Sporting Characteristics. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1975-1985.

Publication History

Copyright © 2026, Savaş Ayhan, Ercan Ti̇zar, Ramazan Erdoğan. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search