Abstract
The article examines the specifics of the transformation of Ukrainian national memory in the digital era from the perspective of documentary film, audio narratives and digital visual arts. The aim of the study is to determine the role of digital cultural practices in the preservation, representation and actualization of historical experience, the formation of cultural identity, social consolidation and international representation of Ukraine. The methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach and combines methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative, systemic, content, discursive, visual and audiovisual analysis. We demonstrate that digitalization transforms national memory from a mostly institutional model into a network, multimodal and participatory system, in which documentary, audio and visual formats serve complementary functions. They become particularly relevant in the Russian-Ukrainian war, as they enable quick documentation of events, preservation of personal testimonies, symbolic formulation of traumatic experience and its international communication. The main risks of digital memory are identified: disinformation, decontextualization, platform dependence, privacy violations, and technological obsolescence. The study emphasizes the need for systematic verification of digital materials, standardization of metadata, backups, open formats, and the creation of a reliable institutional framework for digital archiving.
Keywords: national memory, digital memory, cultural identity, documentary film, audio narratives, digital visual art
Abstract
The article examines the specifics of the transformation of Ukrainian national memory in the digital era from the perspective of documentary film, audio narratives and digital visual arts. The aim of the study is to determine the role of digital cultural practices in the preservation, representation and actualization of historical experience, the formation of cultural identity, social consolidation and international representation of Ukraine. The methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach and combines methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative, systemic, content, discursive, visual and audiovisual analysis. We demonstrate that digitalization transforms national memory from a mostly institutional model into a network, multimodal and participatory system, in which documentary, audio and visual formats serve complementary functions. They become particularly relevant in the Russian-Ukrainian war, as they enable quick documentation of events, preservation of personal testimonies, symbolic formulation of traumatic experience and its international communication. The main risks of digital memory are identified: disinformation, decontextualization, platform dependence, privacy violations, and technological obsolescence. The study emphasizes the need for systematic verification of digital materials, standardization of metadata, backups, open formats, and the creation of a reliable institutional framework for digital archiving.
Keywords: national memory, digital memory, cultural identity, documentary film, audio narratives, digital visual art
References
- Ponomarenko, Liudmyla, et al. “The Role of Information Technologies
in Developing Future Specialists’ Communicative Competence.” Khazar
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 26, no. 1, special
issue, 2023, pp. 92–106. https://ejournal.khazar.org/index.php/kjhss/article/view/32
- Bessarab, Anastasiia, et al. “The Development of Critical Thinking
and Fact-Checking as a Basis for Shaping the Media Culture and
Psychological Health of Modern Youth.” AD ALTA: Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 13, no. 2, special issue XXXVI,
2023, pp. 115–19. https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/130236/papers/A_21.pdf
- Assmann, Jan. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” Translated
by John Czaplicka, New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, pp.
125–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538
- Erll, Astrid. Memory in Culture. Translated by Sara B.
Young, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670
- Hoskins, Andrew. “Digital Network Memory.” Mediation,
Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory, edited by Astrid
Erll and Ann Rigney, De Gruyter, 2009, pp. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217384.1.91
- Hoskins, Andrew. “Media, Memory, Metaphor: Remembering and the
Connective Turn.” Parallax, vol. 17, no. 4, 2011, pp. 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605573
- Garde-Hansen, Joanne, Andrew Hoskins, and Anna Reading, editors.
Save As… Digital Memories. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/save-as-digital-memories/
- Mandolessi, Silvana. “The Digital Turn in Memory Studies.” Memory
Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, 2023, pp. 1513–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231204201
- Frosh, Paul, and Amit Pinchevski, editors. Media Witnessing:
Testimony in the Age of Mass Communication. Palgrave Macmillan,
2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235762
- Frosh, Paul, and Amit Pinchevski. “Crisis-Readiness and Media
Witnessing.” The Communication Review, vol. 12, no. 3, 2009,
pp. 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420903124234
- Mortensen, Mette. “Connective Witnessing: Reconfiguring the
Relationship between the Individual and the Collective.”
Information, Communication & Society, vol. 18, no. 11,
2015, pp. 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061574
- Makhortykh, Mykola. “Remediating the Past: YouTube and Second World
War Memory in Ukraine and Russia.” Memory Studies, vol. 13, no.
2, 2020, pp. 146–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017730867
- Makhortykh, Mykola. “The User Is Dead, Long Live the Platform?
Problematising the User-Centric Focus of (Digital) Memory Studies.”
Memory Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, 2023, pp. 1500–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231202849
- Kortti, Jukka. “War, Transgenerational Memory and Documentary Film:
Mediated and Institutional Memory in Historical Culture.” Rethinking
History, vol. 26, no. 1, 2022, pp. 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2022.2042649
- Erll, Astrid. “Literature, Film, and the Mediality of Cultural
Memory.” Travels in Time: Essays on Collective Memory in
Motion, Oxford UP, 2025, pp. 157–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197767733.003.0009
- Katerynych, Petro, et al. “Documenting Resistance and Memory: A
Decade of Docudays UA Films (2014–2024).” Cogent Arts &
Humanities, vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, article 2670155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2670155
- Moskalenko-Vysotska, Olena, and Roman Shyrman. “Russia-Ukraine War as
a Thematic Dominant in Ukrainian Documentary Cinema of the Last Decade.”
Bulletin of KNUKiM. Series in Arts, no. 50, 2024, pp. 50–58. https://arts-series-knukim.pp.ua/article/download/306757/298327/708890
- Kot, Svitlana, et al. “The Discursive Power of Digital Popular Art
during the Russo-Ukrainian War: Re/Shaping Visual Narratives.”
Arts, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024, article 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13010038
- Kot, Svitlana, et al. “Digital War Diaries: Witnessing the 2022
Russian War against Ukraine.” Memory, Mind & Media, vol. 3,
2024, article e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2024.11
- Volynets, Viktoriia, and Yulia Trach. “Digital Cultural Memory of
Ukraine during the War: Transformations, Challenges and Perspectives.”
Issues in Cultural Studies, no. 47, 2026, pp. 130–42. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.47.2026.360791
- Bessarab, Anastasiia, et al. “Creating a Digital Institution of
Higher Education: Theory and Practice.” Revista Eduweb, vol.
16, no. 3, 2022, pp. 106–20. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.03.8
- Hoskins, Andrew. “7/7 and Connective Memory: Interactional
Trajectories of Remembering in Post-Scarcity Culture.” Memory
Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, 2011, pp. 269–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698011402570
- Makhortykh, Mykola. “Unreliable Narrators or Untimely Archivists?
Challenges of Using Digital Platforms for Documenting and Remembering
Russia’s War in Ukraine.” Georgetown Journal of International
Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, 2023, pp. 165–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2023.a913642
- Rinat Akhmetov Foundation. “Museum of Civilian Voices: Rinat Akhmetov
Foundation Creates a Unique Museum of Stories of Donbas Residents.”
Museum of Civilian Voices, 18 Sept. 2020. https://civilvoicesmuseum.org/en/news/golosy-myrnyh-fond-rinata-ahmetova-stvoryue-unikalnyy-muzey-istoriy-zhyteliv-donbasu.
- National Agency on Corruption Prevention. “Four Years of NACP 2.0:
Sanctions Policy.” 15 Jan. 2024. https://nazk.gov.ua/en/news/four-years-of-nacp-2-0-sanctions-policy/.
- Defence Intelligence of Ukraine. War & Sanctions,
official public-data portal. Accessed 14 Oct. 2026. https://war-sanctions.gur.gov.ua/en/.
- Memorial Platform. Memorial: Memory Lives in Action,
official website. Accessed 14 Oct. 2026. https://memorial.ua/.
- Local History. Local History: Ukrainian Historical Media
Platform, official website. Accessed 14 Oct. 2026. https://localhistory.org.ua/.
- Media Center Ukraine. “Culture Ministry Launches over 20 Cultural
Projects to Combat Russia on Information Front.” 15 June 2022. https://mediacenter.org.ua/culture-ministry-launches-over-20-cultural-projects-to-combat-russia-on-information-front/.
- Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance. “The Russian-Ukrainian
War: Historical Context. Official information-materials collection.
Accessed 14 Oct. 2026. https://uinp.gov.ua/informaciyni-materialy/rosiysko-ukrayinska-viyna-istorychnyy-kontekst.
How to cite:
Tetiana Hyrina, Alina Zadorozhnia, Lidiia Koval, Angelina Tregub, Liudmyla Cherniavska-Lomakina. Reconstructing National Memory in the Digital Age: Documentary Film, Audionarratives and Digital Visual Art in Ukraine. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1986-2001.
Publication History
-
Received: 15/07/2026
-
Accepted: 27/09/2026
-
Published: 15/10/2026
Copyright © 2026, Tetiana Hyrina, Alina Zadorozhnia, Lidiia Koval, Angelina Tregub, Liudmyla Cherniavska-Lomakina. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).