Conceptualization of the “Smart Body” in 21st-Century Choreographic Practices: Somatic Approaches and Dance Performativity

Olha Martyniv1, Olena Tishchenko2, Olena Yefimova3, Viktoriia Kosychenko3, Nataliya Bugayets3
1Department of Vocal-Choral, Choreographic and Visual Arts, Faculty of Primary Education and Art, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine
2Department of Choreography, Assistant Professor of the Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
3Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624133
Published: 30/09/2026
: Olha Martyniv, Olena Tishchenko, Olena Yefimova, Viktoriia Kosychenko, Nataliya Bugayets. Conceptualization of the “Smart Body” in 21st-Century Choreographic Practices: Somatic Approaches and Dance Performativity. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1618-1631.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to conceptualize the “smart body” as an integrative model of choreographic action by establishing relationships among bodily awareness, self-regulation, cognitive, neuroplastic, creative, and performative mechanisms. The study was conducted in August 2026 as a theoretical and conceptual desk study based on a structured integrative review and qualitative thematic synthesis of a purposive non-random sample of 30 scientific works published in 2022–2024, including 2 academic monographs and 28 journal publications. As a result, six functionally related domains were identified. The largest share of the corpus consisted of studies of embodied cognition and agency: 8 works, or 26.7%. Somatic awareness and neuroplasticity/sensorimotor adaptability were each represented by 5 works, or 16.7%, while self-regulation, creative choice and improvisation, and dance performativity were each represented by 4 works, or 13.3%. The synthesis showed that the individual domains did not explain adaptive choreographic behavior in isolation. Their functional interaction formed a cyclical system in which bodily information was transformed into regulatory and cognitive decisions, modified through sensorimotor adaptation, implemented through creative action, and returned to the system through performative feedback. On this basis, a conceptual model of the “smart body” as an adaptive bodily-cognitive system was formulated. The proposed model can be used to develop educational strategies focused on autonomous movement regulation, creative variability, reflective decision-making, and conscious performative interaction.

Keywords: modern dance, creative process, choreographic education, somatic practices, self-regulation, neuroplasticity

Abstract

The aim of the study was to conceptualize the “smart body” as an integrative model of choreographic action by establishing relationships among bodily awareness, self-regulation, cognitive, neuroplastic, creative, and performative mechanisms. The study was conducted in August 2026 as a theoretical and conceptual desk study based on a structured integrative review and qualitative thematic synthesis of a purposive non-random sample of 30 scientific works published in 2022–2024, including 2 academic monographs and 28 journal publications. As a result, six functionally related domains were identified. The largest share of the corpus consisted of studies of embodied cognition and agency: 8 works, or 26.7%. Somatic awareness and neuroplasticity/sensorimotor adaptability were each represented by 5 works, or 16.7%, while self-regulation, creative choice and improvisation, and dance performativity were each represented by 4 works, or 13.3%. The synthesis showed that the individual domains did not explain adaptive choreographic behavior in isolation. Their functional interaction formed a cyclical system in which bodily information was transformed into regulatory and cognitive decisions, modified through sensorimotor adaptation, implemented through creative action, and returned to the system through performative feedback. On this basis, a conceptual model of the “smart body” as an adaptive bodily-cognitive system was formulated. The proposed model can be used to develop educational strategies focused on autonomous movement regulation, creative variability, reflective decision-making, and conscious performative interaction.

Keywords: modern dance, creative process, choreographic education, somatic practices, self-regulation, neuroplasticity

References

  1. Welch, Shay. Choreography as Embodied Critical Inquiry: Embodied Cognition and Creative Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.

  2. Piquero Álvarez, Lucía. Contemporary Dance Choreography and Spectatorship: Embodied Emotion. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023.

  3. Yang, Ching-Ju, et al. “Trait Representation of Embodied Cognition in Dancers Pivoting on the Extended Mirror Neuron System: A Resting-State fMRI Study.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, 2023, article 1173993.

  4. Yang, Ching-Ju, et al. “Embodied Metacognition as Strengthened Functional Connection between Neural Correlates of Metacognition and Dance in Dancers: Exploring Creativity Implications.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 18, 2024, article 1347386.

  5. Hackney, Madeleine E., et al. “The Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation of Dance.” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 25, 2024, article 58.

  6. Virtanen, Niia, et al. “Exploring Body Consciousness of Dancers, Athletes, and Lightly Physically Active Adults.” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, 2022, article 8353.

  7. Richard, Véronique, et al. “The Exploration of the Holistic and Complex Impacts of Creative Dance on Creative Potential Enhancement.” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 58, no. 3, 2024, pp. 511–529.

  8. Lindberg, Lindsay, et al. “Improvisational Dance as Enactive Cognition: What Do Novice Dancers Teach Us about Embodied Cognition in Dance?” Journal of Dance Education, vol. 23, no. 4, 2023, pp. 329–340.

  9. de Wet, Micia. “Critically Considering Embodied Cognition and Research in Theatre and Performance.” Theatre Research International, vol. 47, no. 2, 2022, pp. 182–194.

  10. Baird, Emily. “A Qualitative Investigation of What ‘Body Awareness’ Means to Dancers at a Public Midwestern University.” Journal of Dance Education, vol. 22, no. 2, 2022, pp. 71–82.

  11. Barry, Olivia. “Tracing the Felt Image to Thought: A Somatic Turn towards the Nature of the Creative Process in Country Dance Choreography.” Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, pp. 249–261.

  12. Alfaro Herrera, Mariana, and Giovanni Sánchez Chacón. “La educación somática y su relación con la enseñanza del ballet para bailarines de danza contemporánea: principios psicopedagógicos para la autorregulación del aprendizaje en la expresión artística.” Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, pp. 1–27.

  13. Petsilas, Phaedra, and Livia Massarelli. “Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Meditation in a Dance Conservatoire Context.” Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, vol. 16, nos. 1–2, 2024, pp. 107–124.

  14. Houston, Sara. “Embodied Agency through Soft Skills Development in Dance.” Frontiers in Cognition, vol. 3, 2024, article 1396904.

  15. Engdahl, C., et al. “Dancing as Searching with Deleuze: A Study of What Students in Physical Education Teacher Education Express and Experience in Creative Dance Lessons.” Research in Dance Education, vol. 25, no. 4, 2024, pp. 375–390.

  16. Markula, Pirkko, and Janita Frantsi. “Embodied Collaborative Writing in Graduate Dance Education.” Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, vol. 6, 2024, article 1330422.

  17. Thomson, Paula, and S. Victoria Jaque. “Creativity and Flow: Not a Simple Relationship.” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 57, no. 3, 2023, pp. 397–408.

  18. Mendoza Garay, Juan Ignacio, et al. “Exploring Relations between Big Five Personality Traits and Musical Emotions Embodied in Spontaneous Dance.” Psychology of Music, vol. 51, no. 4, 2023, pp. 1314–1332.

  19. Stutesman, Megan G., and Thalia R. Goldstein. “Mechanisms for Affect Communication from Dance: A Mixed Methods Study.” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 58, no. 1, 2024, pp. 28–46.

  20. Meulenberg, Cécil J. W., et al. “Unleashing the Potential of Dance: A Neuroplasticity-Based Approach Bridging from Older Adults to Parkinson’s Disease Patients.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 15, 2023, article 1188855.

  21. Duarte, Juliana dos Santos, et al. “Physical Activity Based on Dance Movements as Complementary Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Effects on Movement, Executive Functions, Depressive Symptoms, and Quality of Life.” PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, article e0281204.

  22. Millman, L. S. M., et al. “Online Structured Dance/Movement Therapy Reduces Bodily Detachment in Depersonalization-Derealization Disorder.” Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, vol. 51, 2023, article 101749.

  23. Fong Yan, Alycia, et al. “The Effectiveness of Dance Interventions on Psychological and Cognitive Health Outcomes Compared with Other Forms of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.” Sports Medicine, vol. 54, no. 5, 2024, pp. 1179–1205.

  24. Delafin, Maïté, et al. “Interoceptive Sensibility in Professional Dancers Living with or without Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Medical Problems of Performing Artists, vol. 37, no. 1, 2022, pp. 58–66.

  25. Romita, Allegra, and Nancy Romita. “Honoring All Bodies: Student-Centered Alignment Cueing to Improve Dance Skills.” Dance Education in Practice, vol. 10, no. 2, 2024, pp. 9–14.

  26. Oka, Chiharu. “The Relationship between Dance Proficiency and Self-Regulated Learning as Expressed in Dancers’ Changing Views of Dance: From a Comparison between Dance Students and Professional Dancers.” Research Journal of Sports Performance, vol. 15, 2023, pp. 83–100.

  27. Barnstaple, Rebecca Elizabeth, et al. “This Time with Feeling: Recommendations for Full-Bodied Reporting of Research on Dance.” Frontiers in Cognition, vol. 3, 2024, article 1385087.

  28. Jochum, Elizabeth, et al. “The Effects of Folk-Dance in Schools on Physical and Mental Health for At-Risk Adolescents: A Pilot Intervention Study.” Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, vol. 6, 2024, article 1434661.

  29. Nascimento, Marcelo de Maio. “Dança Criativa e Improvisação: Benefícios para Cognição de Crianças e Adolescentes.” Educação, vol. 47, 2022, article e54, pp. 1–20.

  30. Whitehead, Paige M., et al. “Capturing Spontaneous Interactivity: A Multi-Measure Approach to Analyzing the Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination in Dance Improvisation.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, 2024, article 1465595.

Olha Martyniv
Department of Vocal-Choral, Choreographic and Visual Arts, Faculty of Primary Education and Art, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine
Olena Tishchenko
Department of Choreography, Assistant Professor of the Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Olena Yefimova
Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Viktoriia Kosychenko
Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Nataliya Bugayets
Department of Choreography, Faculty of Arts, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

How to cite:

Olha Martyniv, Olena Tishchenko, Olena Yefimova, Viktoriia Kosychenko, Nataliya Bugayets. Conceptualization of the “Smart Body” in 21st-Century Choreographic Practices: Somatic Approaches and Dance Performativity. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1618-1631.

Publication History

Copyright © 2026, Olha Martyniv, Olena Tishchenko, Olena Yefimova, Viktoriia Kosychenko, Nataliya Bugayets. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search