Revista Cultura Científica - web logo
Submit Your Research
  • Research Article

Perceptions of Trade Remedy Law and Firms’ Response Readiness in Vietnam: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Approach

Long Tran Viet1, Hai Phan Thanh2
1Associate Professor, PhD, Head of the Department of Training, University of Law, Hue University, Hue, 49000, Vietnam
2Associate Professor, PhD, Dean, School of Business and Economics, Faculty of Accounting, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624191
Published: 04/11/2026
: Long Tran Viet, Hai Phan Thanh. Perceptions of Trade Remedy Law and Firms’ Response Readiness in Vietnam: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Approach. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 2369-2389.

Abstract

This study examines the factors associated with firms’ response readiness to trade remedy measures among business owners and managers of import–export enterprises, with perceived legal effectiveness of trade remedy law and trust in the legal and enforcement system examined as mediating variables. The research model is grounded in the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) framework and empirically tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from a survey of 425 business owners and managers of import–export enterprises in Vietnam, an emerging economy in Asia. The findings indicate that perceived legal fairness, legal information accessibility, and perceived government support are positively associated with firms’ response readiness through selected indirect pathways involving legal effectiveness and institutional trust. In contrast, perceived legal clarity and digital legal information quality are not significantly associated with firms’ response readiness. Furthermore, importance–performance map analysis (IPMA) identifies perceived legal effectiveness of trade remedy law and trust in the legal and enforcement system as priority factors for enhancing firms’ response readiness. The findings contribute to the empirical literature on trade remedies by extending the analysis to firms’ perceptions and behavioral readiness. They also provide practical implications for regulatory authorities to improve the effectiveness of trade remedy law enforcement, strengthen trust in the legal and enforcement system, and enhance import–export firms’ capacity to respond to trade remedy risks.

Keywords: trade remedy law; firms’ response readiness; perceived legal effectiveness; legal trust; perceived legal fairness; SOR theory; import-export firms; Vietnam

Abstract

This study examines the factors associated with firms’ response readiness to trade remedy measures among business owners and managers of import–export enterprises, with perceived legal effectiveness of trade remedy law and trust in the legal and enforcement system examined as mediating variables. The research model is grounded in the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) framework and empirically tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from a survey of 425 business owners and managers of import–export enterprises in Vietnam, an emerging economy in Asia. The findings indicate that perceived legal fairness, legal information accessibility, and perceived government support are positively associated with firms’ response readiness through selected indirect pathways involving legal effectiveness and institutional trust. In contrast, perceived legal clarity and digital legal information quality are not significantly associated with firms’ response readiness. Furthermore, importance–performance map analysis (IPMA) identifies perceived legal effectiveness of trade remedy law and trust in the legal and enforcement system as priority factors for enhancing firms’ response readiness. The findings contribute to the empirical literature on trade remedies by extending the analysis to firms’ perceptions and behavioral readiness. They also provide practical implications for regulatory authorities to improve the effectiveness of trade remedy law enforcement, strengthen trust in the legal and enforcement system, and enhance import–export firms’ capacity to respond to trade remedy risks.

Keywords: trade remedy law; firms’ response readiness; perceived legal effectiveness; legal trust; perceived legal fairness; SOR theory; import-export firms; Vietnam

References

  1. Li, Wenjing; Peng, Yuanhuai; Sun, Hanwen; Tan, Youchao. “Trade Shocks and Investment Efficiency.” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 93, 2025, article 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102795.

  2. Kim, Minjae; Pak, Myongsop. “Analysis of Factors for Korea’s Export Companies to Respond to Trade Remedies: Mediation Effect of Fairness Perception.” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13, 2022, article 7725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137725.

  3. Tran Viet, Long; Phan Thanh, Hai. “Mediating Effects of Risk Perception and Management Attitude toward the Intention to Implement Trade Remedies: A Case Study in Vietnam.” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 21, no. 4, 2023, pp. 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.03.

  4. Gobena, Lemessa Bayissa; Van Dijke, Marius. “Power, Justice, and Trust: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of Tax Compliance among Ethiopian Business Owners.” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 52, 2016, pp. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004.

  5. Mehrabian, Albert, and James A. Russell. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, 1974. ISBN 978-0-262-13090-5.

  6. Portuese, Aurelien; Gough, Orla; and Tanega, Joseph. “The Principle of Legal Certainty as a Principle of Economic Efficiency.” European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 44, no. 1, 2017, pp. 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9435-2.

  7. Dimitras, Augustinos; Fourlas, Vasileios; Kirchler, Erich; Peppas, George. “Drivers of Tax Compliance: Survey Evidence from 1761 Greek Micro-Firms.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 119, 2025, article 102480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2025.102480.

  8. Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan; Aleksovska, Marija; van Erp, Judith; Gilad, Sharon; Maman, Libby; Bach, Tobias; Kappler, Moritz; Van Dooren, Wouter; Schomaker, Rahel M; Houlberg Salomonsen, Heidi. “Does Enforcement Style Influence Citizen Trust in Regulatory Agencies? An Experiment in Six Countries.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 35, no. 1, 2025, pp. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae018.

  9. Nadia Fajriana; Gugus Irianto; Wuryan Andayani. “The Role of Tax Fairness and Taxpayer Trust in Building Voluntary Compliance in MSME Taxpayers.” International Journal of Business and Society, vol. 24, no. 1, 2023, pp. 478–487. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5629.2023.

  10. Bergquist, Magnus. “Limiting Support for Environmental Policies: Unfairness Is a More Critical Barrier Than Cost and Ineffectiveness.” Ambio, vol. 54, no. 2, 2025, pp. 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02074-9.

  11. Kappler, Moritz; Verhoest, Koen; Bach, Tobias; Maman, Libby; Schomaker, Rahel. “What Drives Trust in Regulatory Agencies? Probing the Relevance of Governmental Level and Performance through a Cross-National Elite Experiment on EU Regulation.” European Political Science Review, vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, pp. 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773924000080.

  12. Lee, Bill; Brierley, John. “Confluent Trust, Accountability, Procedural Justice, British Credit Unions and Regulatory Reform after the Global Financial Crisis.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 44, nos. 1–2, 2024, pp. 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-08-2023-0181.

  13. Virkar, Shefali; Alexopoulos, Charalampos; Tsekeridou, Sofia; Novak, Anna-Sophie. “A User-Centred Analysis of Decision Support Requirements in Legal Informatics.” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, 2022, article 101713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101713.

  14. Chang, Connie. “Improving Access to Free Online Legal Information Through Universal Design: User Personas, User Journeys, a Proposal, and a Prototype.” Legal Reference Services Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 4, 2021, pp. 199–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2021.2003686.

  15. Harding, Rosie; Keeling, Amanda. “Raising Relational Legal Consciousness through Co-Production Research? Making Law More Accessible.” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 51, no. S1, 2024, pp. S102–S117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12500.

  16. Ye, Xin; Su, Xiaoyan; Yao, Zhijun; Dong, Lu-an; Lin, Qiang; Yu, Shuo. “How Do Citizens View Digital Government Services? Study on Digital Government Service Quality Based on Citizen Feedback.” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 14, 2023, article 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143122.

  17. AlAwadhi, Suha; Alansari, Husain; Alsaber, Ahmad R.. “Explicating Trust-Building Factors Impacting the Use of E-Government Services.” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 42, no. 5, 2024, pp. 1244–1265. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231220757.

  18. Hutahaean, Marlan; Eunike, Ixora Javanisa; Silalahi, Andri Dayarana K.. “Do Social Media, Good Governance, and Public Trust Increase Citizens’ E-Government Participation? Dual Approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2023, 2023, article 9988602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9988602.

  19. Nam, Hyundong; Nam, Taewoo; Kim, Songeun. “Identifying the Determinants of Platform-Based E-Government Service Use.” Journal of Global Information Management, vol. 32, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.336554.

  20. Nguyen Son, Ha; Phan Thanh, Hai. “Does the Dispute Resolution Mechanism Influence Investment Trust in Free Trade Zones? Insights from Business Managers in Vietnam.” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 23, no. 3, 2025, pp. 113–129. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.09.

  21. Huong, Vu Van; Cuong, Ly Kim. “Does Government Support Promote SME Tax Payments? New Evidence from Vietnam.” Finance Research Letters, vol. 31, 2019, pp. 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.11.017.

  22. Thanh Tung, Le; Tien Thanh, Pham. “Government Response and Compliance Behaviours: Evidence from COVID-19 Pandemic.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 17, no. 4, 2023, pp. 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2023-0075.

  23. Verhoest, Koen; Maggetti, Martino; Guaschino, Edoardo; Wynen, Jan. “How Trust Matters for the Performance and Legitimacy of Regulatory Regimes: The Differential Impact of Watchful Trust and Good-Faith Trust.” Regulation & Governance, vol. 19, no. 1, 2025, pp. 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12596.

  24. Na, Chongmin; Kang, Inkyu; Lee, Seulki; Chae, Seonhwa. “How Policy Effectiveness Leads to Voluntary Policy Compliance during Crises: A Cross-National Comparison between the US and South Korea.” Crime, Law and Social Change, vol. 84, no. 1, 2026, article 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-026-10272-7.

  25. Maman, Libby; Fahy, Lauren; Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan; Kappler, Moritz. “Measuring Citizen Trust in Regulatory Agencies: A Systematic Review and Ways Forward.” Regulation & Governance, vol. 19, no. 1, 2025, pp. 39–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12618.

  26. Podsakoff, Philip M.; MacKenzie, Scott B.; Lee, Jeong-Yeon; Podsakoff, Nathan P.. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, 2003, pp. 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

  27. Kock, Ned. “Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach.” International Journal of e-Collaboration, vol. 11, no. 4, 2015, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

  28. F. Hair Jr, Joe; Sarstedt, Marko; Hopkins, Lucas; G. Kuppelwieser, Volker. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research.” European Business Review, vol. 26, no. 2, 2014, pp. 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128.

  29. Hair, Joseph F.; Risher, Jeffrey J.; Sarstedt, Marko; Ringle, Christian M.. “When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM.” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, 2019, pp. 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203.

  30. Fornell, Claes; Larcker, David F.. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, 1981, pp. 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

  31. Henseler, Jörg; Ringle, Christian M.; Sarstedt, Marko. “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, no. 1, 2015, pp. 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

  32. Hu, Li‐tze; Bentler, Peter M.. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, 1999, pp. 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

  33. Cohen, Jacob. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

  34. Ringle, Christian M., and Marko Sarstedt. “Gain More Insight from Your PLS-SEM Results: The Importance-Performance Map Analysis.” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 116, no. 9, 2016, pp. 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449.

Long Tran Viet
Associate Professor, PhD, Head of the Department of Training, University of Law, Hue University, Hue, 49000, Vietnam
Hai Phan Thanh
Associate Professor, PhD, Dean, School of Business and Economics, Faculty of Accounting, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam
phanthanhhai@duytan.edu.vn

How to cite:

Long Tran Viet, Hai Phan Thanh. Perceptions of Trade Remedy Law and Firms’ Response Readiness in Vietnam: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Approach. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 2369-2389.

Publication History

  • Received: 19/08/2026
  • Accepted: 30/10/2026
  • Published: 04/11/2026
Copyright © 2026, Long Tran Viet, Hai Phan Thanh. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search