Revista Cultura Científica - web logo
Submit Your Research
  • Research Article

Facilitating Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education: An Integrated Narrative Review

Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader1
1College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC); Ministry of National Guard–Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624131
Published: 30/09/2026
: Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader. Facilitating Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education: An Integrated Narrative Review. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1598-1605.

Abstract

Critical thinking is a central goal of undergraduate medical education because students must learn to interpret evidence, question assumptions, compare competing explanations, and justify decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Although the literature contains many accounts of barriers to critical thinking, the evidence on conditions that facilitate its development is more dispersed across studies of active learning, clinical reasoning, feedback, student engagement, higher-order thinking, and faculty facilitation. This focused narrative review integrates that literature into three cross-cutting domains rather than treating individual teaching techniques as isolated facilitators. The first domain is pedagogical architecture: active, problem-oriented, and cognitively demanding learning designs that require students to analyze information, explain relationships, and make decisions. The second is the relational learning climate: psychological safety, dialogic feedback, questioning, and guided reflection that make it possible for learners to expose incomplete reasoning and revise it. The third is faculty cognitive apprenticeship: making expert reasoning visible through facilitation, modeling, think-aloud explanation, mentoring, and deliberate scaffolding. Evidence is strongest for active and problem-centered approaches, including problem-based learning and concept mapping, while the evidence for relational climate and role modeling is more qualitative and context-dependent. The review therefore argues against treating critical-thinking development as the product of any single method. Instead, critical thinking is most plausibly supported when curriculum design, feedback practices, learner participation, and faculty reasoning are aligned. The review also identifies important limitations in the field, including inconsistent definitions of critical thinking, frequent conflation with clinical reasoning or academic performance, reliance on single-site studies for several relational facilitators, and limited cross-cultural or longitudinal evidence. Future research should test integrated models of facilitation using multi-institutional and mixed-methods designs and should distinguish clearly between critical-thinking skills, dispositions, clinical reasoning, and general learning outcomes.

Keywords: critical thinking, undergraduate medical education, active learning, feedback, clinical reasoning, faculty facilitation, narrative review

Abstract

Critical thinking is a central goal of undergraduate medical education because students must learn to interpret evidence, question assumptions, compare competing explanations, and justify decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Although the literature contains many accounts of barriers to critical thinking, the evidence on conditions that facilitate its development is more dispersed across studies of active learning, clinical reasoning, feedback, student engagement, higher-order thinking, and faculty facilitation. This focused narrative review integrates that literature into three cross-cutting domains rather than treating individual teaching techniques as isolated facilitators. The first domain is pedagogical architecture: active, problem-oriented, and cognitively demanding learning designs that require students to analyze information, explain relationships, and make decisions. The second is the relational learning climate: psychological safety, dialogic feedback, questioning, and guided reflection that make it possible for learners to expose incomplete reasoning and revise it. The third is faculty cognitive apprenticeship: making expert reasoning visible through facilitation, modeling, think-aloud explanation, mentoring, and deliberate scaffolding. Evidence is strongest for active and problem-centered approaches, including problem-based learning and concept mapping, while the evidence for relational climate and role modeling is more qualitative and context-dependent. The review therefore argues against treating critical-thinking development as the product of any single method. Instead, critical thinking is most plausibly supported when curriculum design, feedback practices, learner participation, and faculty reasoning are aligned. The review also identifies important limitations in the field, including inconsistent definitions of critical thinking, frequent conflation with clinical reasoning or academic performance, reliance on single-site studies for several relational facilitators, and limited cross-cultural or longitudinal evidence. Future research should test integrated models of facilitation using multi-institutional and mixed-methods designs and should distinguish clearly between critical-thinking skills, dispositions, clinical reasoning, and general learning outcomes.

Keywords: critical thinking, undergraduate medical education, active learning, feedback, clinical reasoning, faculty facilitation, narrative review

References

  1. Facione, Peter A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction: Research Findings and Recommendations. American Philosophical Association, 1990. ERIC Document ED315423.

  2. Araújo, Beatriz, Sandra F. Gomes, and Laura Ribeiro. “Critical Thinking Pedagogical Practices in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 11, 2024, article 1358444.

  3. Abrami, Philip C., Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, David I. Waddington, C. Anne Wade, and Tonje Persson. “Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 85, no. 2, 2015, pp. 275–314.

  4. Batarfi, Munirah A., and Sajida Agha. “Exploring Faculty Perspectives on Critical Thinking in Medical Education: Challenges, Strategies, and Institutional Support.” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, 2025, pp. 670–678.

  5. Al-Bader, Abdullah bin Abdulrahman. “From Barriers to Enablers: Exploring Facilitators of Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education.” Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, vol. 29, special issue 4, 2025, article e025098.

  6. Ge, Wei-Li, Xia-Yin Zhu, Jiang-Bo Lin, Jian-Jun Jiang, Tao Li, Yi-Fei Lu, Ya-Fei Mi, and Tao-Hsin Tung. “Critical Thinking and Clinical Skills by Problem-Based Learning Educational Methods: An Umbrella Systematic Review.” BMC Medical Education, vol. 25, 2025, article 455.

  7. Fonseca, Marta, Pedro Marvão, Beatriz Oliveira, Bruno Heleno, Pedro Carreiro-Martins, Nuno Neuparth, and António Rendas. “The Effectiveness of Concept Mapping as a Tool for Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education—A BEME Systematic Review: BEME Guide No. 81.” Medical Teacher, vol. 46, no. 9, 2024, pp. 1120–1133.

  8. Aulakh, Jasmine, Hana Wahab, Christine Richards, Satesh Bidaisee, and Prakash V. A. K. Ramdass. “Self-Directed Learning versus Traditional Didactic Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.” BMC Medical Education, vol. 25, 2025, article 70.

  9. Gheshlaghi Azar, Nasim, Shahram Yazdani, and Zohreh Khoshgoftar. “Development of Higher-Order Thinking in Health Profession Education: A Comprehensive Toolkit for Medical Educators.” Journal of Education and Health Promotion, vol. 12, 2023, article 455.

  10. Grijpma, Jan Willem, Siema Ramdas, Louti Broeksma, Martijn Meeter, Rashmi A. Kusurkar, and Anne de la Croix. “Learning from the Experts: Stimulating Student Engagement in Small-Group Active Learning.” Perspectives on Medical Education, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024, pp. 229–238.

  11. Hammond, Lucy, Chloe Berg, Bethany J. Howard, Basia Diug, and Olanrewaju Sorinola. “What Is the Role and Value of Facilitation in Case-Based Learning (CBL) in Undergraduate Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature.” Education in the Health Professions, vol. 6, 2023, pp. 139–150.

  12. Maqsood, Zainab, Madiha Sajjad, and Raheela Yasmin. “Effect of Feedback-Integrated Reflection, on Deep Learning of Undergraduate Medical Students in a Clinical Setting.” BMC Medical Education, vol. 25, 2025, article 66.

  13. Nicola-Richmond, Kelli, Nikki Lyons, Natalie Ward, Sally Logan, and Rola Ajjawi. “Feedback Practices in Clinical Placement: How Students Come to Understand How They Are Progressing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, 2025, pp. 323–335.

  14. Bowen, Judith L. “Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 21, 2006, pp. 2217–2225.

  15. Delany, Clare, and Clinton Golding. “Teaching Clinical Reasoning by Making Thinking Visible: An Action Research Project with Allied Health Clinical Educators.” BMC Medical Education, vol. 14, 2014, article 20.

  16. Koh, Eugene Yong Hian, Kai Kee Koh, Yaazhini Renganathan, and Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna. “Role Modelling in Professional Identity Formation: A Systematic Scoping Review.” BMC Medical Education, vol. 23, 2023, article 194.

  17. Patel, Raina, Jacqueline Mirza, J. M. Monica Van de Ridder, and Vijay Rajput. “Role Modeling in Medical Education: A Twenty-First Century Learner’s Perspective.” Medical Science Educator, vol. 33, no. 6, 2023, pp. 1557–1563.

Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader
College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC); Ministry of National Guard–Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
badera@ksau-hs.edu.sa

How to cite:

Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader. Facilitating Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education: An Integrated Narrative Review. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1598-1605.

Publication History

  • Received: 29/05/2026
  • Accepted: 15/09/2026
  • Published: 30/09/2026
Copyright © 2026, Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search