Creating an Inclusive and Safe Educational Environment in Educational Institutions: The Psychological and Pedagogical Aspect

Yuliia Bondarenko1, Olena Akimova2, Iryna Samoilova3, Iryna Batareina4, Maiia Suprun5
1Department of Special and Inclusive Education, Educational and Scientific Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko, Sumy, Ukraine
2Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Primary Education and Educational Management, Psychological and Pedagogical Faculty, Municipal Establishment “Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy” of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
3Department of Special Pedagogy and Psychology and Inclusive Education, Municipal Establishment “Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy” of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
4Department of Preschool Education and Social Work, Faculty of Social, Pedagogical and Art Education, Bogdan Khmelnytskyi Melitopol State Pedagogical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
5Department of Foreign Languages for the Humanities, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624180
Published: 03/11/2026
: Yuliia Bondarenko, Olena Akimova, Iryna Samoilova, Iryna Batareina, Maiia Suprun. Creating an Inclusive and Safe Educational Environment in Educational Institutions: The Psychological and Pedagogical Aspect. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 2208-2220.

Abstract

The study aimed to identify and explain the interconnected psychological, social, pedagogical and organisational conditions that contribute to an accessible, supportive, and safe environment in which diverse groups of students can participate. The study was conducted as an integrative review of research literature with conceptual and thematic synthesis; the review examined a purposively selected, non-random sample comprising 35 English-language peer-reviewed publications from 2021–2026. As a result of content coding, nine interconnected components were identified: accessibility of learning, psychological and social safety, school and classroom climate, a sense of belonging to the community, supportive relationships, social and emotional learning, prevention of bullying and cyberbullying, trauma-informed practices, as well as teachers’ attitudes, self-efficacy and professional development. The synthesis organised these components into four functional levels: individual psychological, interpersonal, pedagogical and organisational. The synthesis highlighted risks at the connections between levels, especially when stated rules are not supported by daily practice, supportive relationships are not accompanied by accessibility of learning, and universal programmes insufficiently take into account the needs of vulnerable groups. It was determined that meaningful student participation is supported when there is consistency among organisational norms, teaching methods, interpersonal interaction and the subjective sense of acceptance and belonging. The practical contribution is an integrated approach to educational planning that combines Universal Design for Learning, teacher support, mechanisms for preventing and responding to bullying, student participation in decision-making and regular assessment of school climate.

Keywords: school climate, social belonging, Universal Design for Learning, social and emotional learning, bullying prevention, trauma-informed practices

Abstract

The study aimed to identify and explain the interconnected psychological, social, pedagogical and organisational conditions that contribute to an accessible, supportive, and safe environment in which diverse groups of students can participate. The study was conducted as an integrative review of research literature with conceptual and thematic synthesis; the review examined a purposively selected, non-random sample comprising 35 English-language peer-reviewed publications from 2021–2026. As a result of content coding, nine interconnected components were identified: accessibility of learning, psychological and social safety, school and classroom climate, a sense of belonging to the community, supportive relationships, social and emotional learning, prevention of bullying and cyberbullying, trauma-informed practices, as well as teachers’ attitudes, self-efficacy and professional development. The synthesis organised these components into four functional levels: individual psychological, interpersonal, pedagogical and organisational. The synthesis highlighted risks at the connections between levels, especially when stated rules are not supported by daily practice, supportive relationships are not accompanied by accessibility of learning, and universal programmes insufficiently take into account the needs of vulnerable groups. It was determined that meaningful student participation is supported when there is consistency among organisational norms, teaching methods, interpersonal interaction and the subjective sense of acceptance and belonging. The practical contribution is an integrated approach to educational planning that combines Universal Design for Learning, teacher support, mechanisms for preventing and responding to bullying, student participation in decision-making and regular assessment of school climate.

Keywords: school climate, social belonging, Universal Design for Learning, social and emotional learning, bullying prevention, trauma-informed practices

References

  1. Margas, Nicolas. “Inclusive Classroom Climate Development as the Cornerstone of Inclusive School Building: Review and Perspectives.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, 2023, article no. 1171204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171204.

  2. Baumsteiger, Rachel, et al. “A Systematic Review of Secondary School Climate Assessments.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2023, article no. 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09748-y.

  3. Allen, Kelly-Ann, et al. “Adolescent School Belonging and Mental Health Outcomes in Young Adulthood: Findings from a Multi-Wave Prospective Cohort Study.” School Mental Health, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-023-09626-6.

  4. Allen, Kelly-Ann. “School Belonging: Evidence, Experts, and Everyday Gaps.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 37, no. 3, 2025, article no. 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10055-x.

  5. Wilson-Ching, Michelle, and Emily Berger. “Relationship Building Strategies within Trauma Informed Frameworks in Educational Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.” Current Psychology, vol. 43, no. 4, 2024, pp. 3464–3485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04590-5.

  6. Bakshi, Prerna. “Between Care and Avoidance: Ethical Limits of Trauma-Informed Pedagogy in Education.” Ethics and Education, vol. 21, no. 4, 2026, pp. 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2026.2695025.

  7. Dignath, Charlotte, et al. “Teachers’ Beliefs about Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: A Meta-Analytical Study.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 4, 2022, pp. 2609–2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0.

  8. Donath, Johanna L., et al. “Does Professional Development Effectively Support the Implementation of Inclusive Education? A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, no. 1, 2023, article no. 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09752-2.

  9. Almeqdad, Qais I., et al. “The Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, article no. 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2218191.

  10. Badger, Julia R., Atiyya Nisar, and Richard P. Hastings. “School-Based Anti-Bullying Approaches for Children and Young People with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 24, no. 3, 2024, pp. 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12665.

  11. Gonzálvez, Carolina, Victoria Bacon, and Christopher A. Kearney. “Systematic and Evaluative Review of School Climate Instruments for Students, Teachers, and Parents.” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 60, no. 6, 2023, pp. 1781–1836. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22838.

  12. García-Rodríguez, Laura, Concha Iriarte Redín, and Charo Reparaz Abaitua. “Teacher-Student Attachment Relationship, Variables Associated, and Measurement: A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review, vol. 38, 2023, article no. 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100488.

  13. Lenkeit, Jenny, et al. “Social Referencing Processes in Inclusive Classrooms—Relationships between Teachers’ Attitudes, Students’ Attitudes, Social Integration and Classroom Climate.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 24, no. 4, 2024, pp. 1190–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12703.

  14. Lindner, Katharina-Theresa, et al. “Do Teachers Favor the Inclusion of All Students? A Systematic Review of Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, vol. 38, no. 6, 2023, pp. 766–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894.

  15. Lindner, Katharina-Theresa, et al. “Secondary School Teachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Recent Results and Research Trends.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24 Mar. 2026. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2026.2649541.

  16. Cipriano, Christina, et al. “The State of Evidence for Social and Emotional Learning: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis of Universal School-Based SEL Interventions.” Child Development, vol. 94, no. 5, 2023, pp. 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968.

  17. Cipriano, Christina, and Michael F. McCarthy. “Towards an Inclusive Social and Emotional Learning.” Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, vol. 2, 2023, article 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2023.100008.

  18. Cipriano, Christina, et al. “A Systematic Review of Student Disability and Race Representation in Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Interventions for Elementary School Students.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 93, no. 1, 2023, pp. 73–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221094079.

  19. Daley, Samantha G., and Michael F. McCarthy. “Students with Disabilities in Social and Emotional Learning Interventions: A Systematic Review.” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 42, no. 6, 2021, pp. 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520964917.

  20. Hassani, Sepideh, and Susanne Schwab. “Social-Emotional Learning Interventions for Students with Special Educational Needs: A Systematic Literature Review.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 6, 2021, article 808566. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.808566.

  21. Cipriano, Christina, et al. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Universal School-Based SEL Programs in the United States: Considerations for Marginalized Students.” Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, vol. 3, 2024, article 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2024.100029.

  22. Hensums, Maud, et al. “What Works for Whom in School-Based Anti-Bullying Interventions? An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.” Prevention Science, vol. 24, no. 8, 2023, pp. 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01387-z.

  23. Li, Sen, et al. “School Climate and Cyberbullying Victimization: A Meta-Analysis.” Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 169, 2025, article 108064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108064.

  24. Cafaro, Cori L., et al. “Meta-Analyses of Teacher-Delivered Trauma-Based and Trauma-Informed Care Interventions.” Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, vol. 15, no. 7, 2023, pp. 1177–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001515.

  25. Berti, Sara, Valentina Grazia, and Luisa Molinari. “Active Student Participation in Whole-School Interventions in Secondary School. A Systematic Literature Review.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2023, article 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09773-x.

  26. Forshaw, Emma, and Kevin Woods. “Student Participation in the Development of Whole-School Wellbeing Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Pastoral Care in Education, vol. 41, no. 4, 2023, pp. 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2022.2148175.

  27. Higgins, Edel, and Roger Booker. “What Are the Main Factors That Are Thought to Impact upon the Implementation of a Whole School Approach to Student Mental Health and Wellbeing in Schools? A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Wellbeing, vol. 13, no. 2, 2023, pp. 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i2.2833.

  28. Zhang, Ling, et al. “Unraveling Challenges with the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning: A Systematic Literature Review.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 36, no. 1, 2024, article 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09860-7.

  29. Woodcock, Stuart, et al. “Teacher Self-Efficacy and Inclusive Education Practices: Rethinking Teachers’ Engagement with Inclusive Practices.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 117, 2022, article 103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802.

  30. Long, Yanlin, Umesh Sharma, and Pearl Subban. “Teachers’ Attitudes and Self-Efficacy toward Inclusive Education in Mainland China: A Meta-Analysis.” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, article 2526872. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2526872.

  31. Russell, Amy, Aideen Scriney, and Sinéad Smyth. “Educator Attitudes towards the Inclusion of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Mainstream Education: A Systematic Review.” Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 10, no. 3, 2023, pp. 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-022-00303-z.

  32. Maldonado-García, Alejandro, Ángel Custodio Mingorance-Estrada, and Inmaculada Alemany-Arrebola. “Attitudes of Prospective Teachers towards the Inclusion of Students with Disability: A Systematic Review.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 13, 2026, article 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102912.

  33. Štremfel, Urška, Klaudija Šterman Ivančič, and Igor Peras. “Addressing the Sense of School Belonging among All Students? A Systematic Literature Review.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, vol. 14, no. 11, 2024, pp. 2901–2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14110190.

  34. Newton, Lise, et al. “Trauma-Informed Programs in Australian Schools: A Systematic Review of Design, Implementation and Efficacy.” Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 156, 2024, article 107368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107368.

  35. Onipede, Z. Ayotola, Alayna Lee Park, and Anna S. Lau. “Common Elements of Trauma-Informed Schools and Attention to Racial Equity: A Scoping Review.” School Mental Health, vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, pp. 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09721-2.

Yuliia Bondarenko
Department of Special and Inclusive Education, Educational and Scientific Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko, Sumy, Ukraine
Olena Akimova
Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Primary Education and Educational Management, Psychological and Pedagogical Faculty, Municipal Establishment “Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy'' of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Iryna Samoilova
Department of Special Pedagogy and Psychology and Inclusive Education, Municipal Establishment “Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy'' of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Iryna Batareina
Department of Preschool Education and Social Work, Faculty of Social, Pedagogical and Art Education, Bogdan Khmelnytskyi Melitopol State Pedagogical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
Maiia Suprun
Department of Foreign Languages for the Humanities, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Lutsk, Ukraine

How to cite:

Yuliia Bondarenko, Olena Akimova, Iryna Samoilova, Iryna Batareina, Maiia Suprun. Creating an Inclusive and Safe Educational Environment in Educational Institutions: The Psychological and Pedagogical Aspect. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 2208-2220.

Publication History

Copyright © 2026, Yuliia Bondarenko, Olena Akimova, Iryna Samoilova, Iryna Batareina, Maiia Suprun. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search