Revista Cultura Científica - web logo
Submit Your Research
  • Research Article

Construction of the Image of Maidan in the Historiography of the Orange Revolution and Its Influence on the Development of the Institute of the Head of State in Ukraine

Eduard Shcherbenko1
1PhD in Philosophy, Leading Researcher, Kyiv History Museum, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70517/revcc2624134
Published: 30/09/2026
: Eduard Shcherbenko. Construction of the Image of Maidan in the Historiography of the Orange Revolution and Its Influence on the Development of the Institute of the Head of State in Ukraine. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1632-1641.

Abstract

The article investigates the construction of the image of the Maidan in the historiographical reflections of actor-narrators of the 2004 civil disobedience movement and reconstructs the mechanisms underlying the formation of a de facto “invisible college” that established an interpretative model of the Maidan based on a positive-sum (win-win) game. The historical-comparative method, narrative analysis, and discourse analysis were applied to documentary materials, memoirs, interviews, and journalistic sources from 2004–2008, while close reading was used to identify the figure of the actor-narrator in reflective texts. The study systematically reconstructs the previously unexplored presence of professionally trained historians at different levels of decision-making and demonstrates how this factor contributed to the peaceful resolution of the unprecedented crisis of the Independence era through a hybrid (r)evolutionary “game” grounded in mutual responsibility. Professional historical education among field commanders (Stets’kiv, Filenko), journalistic leaders (Yanevskyi), and political leaders (Lytvyn) helped structure negotiations around the inclusive formula “not a drop of blood, both sides save face.” Representatives of the creative (proto)class, particularly Zabuzhko, integrated the events into the horizon of “great time” through comparisons with the Sich and Vich, while Donii represented the continuity of revolutionary experience. The analysis also identifies limitations in the imaginative horizon of contemporary actor-narrators, including the marginalization of the role of priests and the gender dimension of the events. The presence of professional historians across different levels of decision-making emerges as a previously undescribed factor that contributed to the peaceful resolution of the 2004 crisis. Further research should examine the Church’s transformation into a civil-society actor during 2005–2013 and reconsider the gender dimension of both Maidans through the perspective of trauma studies.

Keywords: actor-narrator, historiography of Maidan, construction of memory, narrative, responsibility, Maidan

Abstract

The article investigates the construction of the image of the Maidan in the historiographical reflections of actor-narrators of the 2004 civil disobedience movement and reconstructs the mechanisms underlying the formation of a de facto “invisible college” that established an interpretative model of the Maidan based on a positive-sum (win-win) game. The historical-comparative method, narrative analysis, and discourse analysis were applied to documentary materials, memoirs, interviews, and journalistic sources from 2004–2008, while close reading was used to identify the figure of the actor-narrator in reflective texts. The study systematically reconstructs the previously unexplored presence of professionally trained historians at different levels of decision-making and demonstrates how this factor contributed to the peaceful resolution of the unprecedented crisis of the Independence era through a hybrid (r)evolutionary “game” grounded in mutual responsibility. Professional historical education among field commanders (Stets’kiv, Filenko), journalistic leaders (Yanevskyi), and political leaders (Lytvyn) helped structure negotiations around the inclusive formula “not a drop of blood, both sides save face.” Representatives of the creative (proto)class, particularly Zabuzhko, integrated the events into the horizon of “great time” through comparisons with the Sich and Vich, while Donii represented the continuity of revolutionary experience. The analysis also identifies limitations in the imaginative horizon of contemporary actor-narrators, including the marginalization of the role of priests and the gender dimension of the events. The presence of professional historians across different levels of decision-making emerges as a previously undescribed factor that contributed to the peaceful resolution of the 2004 crisis. Further research should examine the Church’s transformation into a civil-society actor during 2005–2013 and reconsider the gender dimension of both Maidans through the perspective of trauma studies.

Keywords: actor-narrator, historiography of Maidan, construction of memory, narrative, responsibility, Maidan

References

  1. Kulchytskyi, Stanislav. The Orange Revolution. Genesa, 2005.

  2. Shapoval, Yurii, editor. In the Colors of the Orange Revolution. ExOb, 2007.

  3. Lytvyn, Volodymyr. Ukraine—2004: Events, Documents, Facts. 3 vols., 3 Media, 2005.

  4. Kipiani, Vakhtang, compiler. The Power of Darkness and Temnyks: A Reader on Political Censorship in Ukraine, 2001–2004. Prosvita, 2005.

  5. Katerynchuk, Mykola. Lawyers of the Orange Revolution. Yustinian, 2005. https://nlu.org.ua/article.php?id=141

  6. Dubynianskyi, Mykhailo. A Thousand Smiles of the Orange Revolution. Fakt, 2005. https://nlu.org.ua/article.php?id=141

  7. Dzikovskyi, P., editor and compiler. Novellas of the Orange Revolution. Concept by O. Myronov, Vidrodzhennia, 2005.

  8. Yes! Ukrainians Win by Laughing. Prepared by Oleksandra Kosarieva, edited by Oleh Chornohuz, VUS, 2005.

  9. Yatseniuk, Arsenii. Banking Secrecy during the Orange Revolution. NVP Polihrafservis, 2008.

  10. Bakke, Kristin M., et al. “Politicizing Memory: Evidence from Ukraine.” Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 72, no. 1, 2025, pp. 16–35.

  11. Yurchuk, Yuliya. “Historians as Activists: History Writing in Times of War. The Case of Ukraine in 2014–2018.” Nationalities Papers, vol. 49, no. 4, 2021, pp. 691–709.

  12. Kasianov, Georgiy. “Challenges of Antagonistic Memory: Scholars versus Politics and War.” Memory Studies, vol. 15, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1295–1298.

  13. Kasianov, Georgiy. “In Search of Lost Time? Decommunization in Ukraine, 2014–2020.” Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 71, no. 4, 2024, pp. 326–340.

  14. Kasianov, Georgiy. “Nationalist Memory Narratives and the Politics of History in Ukraine since the 1990s.” Nationalities Papers, vol. 52, no. 6, 2024, pp. 1235–1254.

  15. Pakhomenko, Sergii. “Decolonization in Ukraine’s Memory Politics: Anticolonialism versus Ambivalence in the City of Odesa.” Nationalities Papers, 2026, pp. 1–27.

  16. Kutsovska, Galyna. “Maidan, Memory, and Museum: Relations between Aesthetics and Revolution, 2014–2021.” Baltic Worlds, vol. 17, nos. 1–2, 2024, pp. 74–94. https://balticworlds.com/maidan-memory-and-museum/

  17. Onyshko, Lesia. “The Future Memorial to the Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred in Kyiv: A Territory of Memory.” Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 65, nos. 3–4, 2023, pp. 370–377.

  18. Munawar, Nour A., and James Symonds. “Empires of Lies? The Political Uses of Cultural Heritage in War.” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, vol. 14, no. 3, 2023, pp. 308–325.

  19. Shiller, Sydney. “Second World War Memory as an Instrument of Counter-Revolution in Putin’s Russia.” Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 65, nos. 3–4, 2023, pp. 432–452.

  20. Ferreira, Maria Leticia Mazzucchi. “Memory before Memory: Museums and War in Ukraine.” Tempo e Argumento, vol. 16, no. 42, 2024, article e0105.

  21. Hilmar, Till. “Signifying the Present in Links to the Past: Memory Organizations React to the February 24, 2022, Russian Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology, vol. 14, 2026, pp. 405–438.

  22. Dmytrycheva, O., S. Rakhmanin, and T. Sylina. “Anatomy of the Soul of the Maidan.” ZN.UA, 10 Dec. 2004. https://zn.ua/ukr/politcs_archive/anatomiya_dushi_maydanu.html

  23. Parubii, Andrii. Commandant’s Notes: Chronicle of the Ukrainian House—Fortress of the Orange Revolution. Liha-Press, 2005.

  24. Yanevskyi, Danylo. Chronicle of the Orange Revolution. Folio, 2005. https://nlu.org.ua/article.php?id=141

  25. Zabuzhko, Oksana. Let My People Go: 15 Texts about the Ukrainian Revolution. Fakt, 2005. https://library.zu.edu.ua/doc/lustopad_2014.pdf

  26. Donii, Oles. “Their Tank against Our Tent.” Ukrainska Pravda, 4 Dec. 2004. https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2004/12/04/3005024/

  27. Solodko, Pavlo. “People Who Created the Style of the Revolution: Part One.” Ukrainska Pravda, 22 Nov. 2005. https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2005/11/22/3020805/

  28. Lebedeva, K. “The Author of the Anthem Is the Presenter of the ‘Weather’ Programme.” Vechirnii Kyiv, 8 Dec. 2004.

  29. Suslova, Olena. People Who Surprised Us in a Country We Did Not Know. Information and Consulting Women’s Center, 2005. https://www.wicc.net.ua/media/people%20surprising%20us.pdf

  30. Kuchma, Leonid. “The Highest Happiness Is to Bring One’s Native Country into the Orbit of Modern Civilization.” 2000, 27 Aug.–2 Sept. 2004.

  31. Collingwood, R. G. The Idea of History. Edited by T. M. Knox, Clarendon Press, 1946. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Idea_of_History.html?id=7S8XAQAAMAAJ

  32. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed., Verso, 2006. https://catalog.folger.edu/record/269498

  33. Connerton, Paul. How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

  34. Hrytsak, Yaroslav. “Reply.” In “On the Discussion of ‘Two Ukraines’.” Krytyka, no. 12, 2004, p. 13.

  35. Donii, Oles. The Generation of the Velvet Revolution: How Do We Survive until 2009?. Smoloskyp, 1999. https://catalog.lounb.org.ua/bib/419264

  36. Ozouf, Mona. Festivals and the French Revolution. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Harvard University Press, 1988. https://books.google.com/books/about/Festivals_and_the_French_Revolution.html?id=xucNAQAAMAAJ

Eduard Shcherbenko
PhD in Philosophy, Leading Researcher, Kyiv History Museum, Kyiv, Ukraine
mysl@ukr.net

How to cite:

Eduard Shcherbenko. Construction of the Image of Maidan in the Historiography of the Orange Revolution and Its Influence on the Development of the Institute of the Head of State in Ukraine. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1632-1641.

Publication History

  • Received: 17/07/2026
  • Accepted: 03/09/2026
  • Published: 30/09/2026
Copyright © 2026, Eduard Shcherbenko. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Browse Advance Search