Abstract
Background: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM), particularly when accompanied by axillary dissection, can cause substantial acute postoperative pain and may contribute to persistent postsurgical pain. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is used as a component of multimodal analgesia, and dexmedetomidine has been investigated as an adjuvant to prolong local-anaesthetic effects. Objective: To compare postoperative pain scores and rescue-analgesia requirements after MRM in patients receiving ESPB with bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine versus bupivacaine alone. Methods: This single-centre randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, ICU and Pain Management, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to June 2026. Sixty women with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II who were scheduled for elective MRM under general anaesthesia were allocated by lottery to two equal groups (n=30 each). A unilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed at the T4 level after surgery. Group BD received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, whereas Group B received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without dexmedetomidine. Pain intensity was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Mean VAS scores were lower in Group BD than in Group B at 1 hour (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5), 12 hours (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.8 ± 0.7) and 24 hours (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.8); all reported between-group pain comparisons had p < 0.001. Rescue analgesia was required by 6 of 30 (20.0%) patients in Group BD and 19 of 30 (63.3%) in Group B (two-sided Fisher’s exact p=0.0014, recalculated from the reported frequencies). No clinically significant haemodynamic instability or block-related complications were reported in either group during the observation period. Conclusion: Adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for ESPB was associated with lower pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours and fewer requests for rescue analgesia after MRM. Interpretation is limited by the modest, single-centre sample and short follow-up; the findings do not establish prevention of chronic postsurgical pain or demonstrate comparative safety for uncommon adverse events.
Keywords: erector spinae plane block, dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, modified radical mastectomy, postoperative pain, visual analogue scale, regional anesthesia
Abstract
Background: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM), particularly when accompanied by axillary dissection, can cause substantial acute postoperative pain and may contribute to persistent postsurgical pain. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is used as a component of multimodal analgesia, and dexmedetomidine has been investigated as an adjuvant to prolong local-anaesthetic effects. Objective: To compare postoperative pain scores and rescue-analgesia requirements after MRM in patients receiving ESPB with bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine versus bupivacaine alone. Methods: This single-centre randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, ICU and Pain Management, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to June 2026. Sixty women with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II who were scheduled for elective MRM under general anaesthesia were allocated by lottery to two equal groups (n=30 each). A unilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed at the T4 level after surgery. Group BD received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, whereas Group B received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without dexmedetomidine. Pain intensity was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Mean VAS scores were lower in Group BD than in Group B at 1 hour (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5), 12 hours (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.8 ± 0.7) and 24 hours (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.8); all reported between-group pain comparisons had p < 0.001. Rescue analgesia was required by 6 of 30 (20.0%) patients in Group BD and 19 of 30 (63.3%) in Group B (two-sided Fisher’s exact p=0.0014, recalculated from the reported frequencies). No clinically significant haemodynamic instability or block-related complications were reported in either group during the observation period. Conclusion: Adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for ESPB was associated with lower pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours and fewer requests for rescue analgesia after MRM. Interpretation is limited by the modest, single-centre sample and short follow-up; the findings do not establish prevention of chronic postsurgical pain or demonstrate comparative safety for uncommon adverse events.
Keywords: erector spinae plane block, dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, modified radical mastectomy, postoperative pain, visual analogue scale, regional anesthesia
References
- Bray, Freddie, et al. “Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN
Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185
Countries.” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 74, no.
3, 2024, pp. 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.
- Ahmed, Karim Ahmed Ismail, et al. “Effect of Adding Fentanyl to
Bupivacaine in Ultra-Sound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in
Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgeries: A Randomized Trial.”
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, vol. 38,
2025, article 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100453.
- Devrajan, Gokila, et al. “Comparison of Intravenous with Perineural
Dexamethasone for Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in
Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy—A Randomized Control
Trial.” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol.
41, no. 2, 2025, pp. 357–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_134_24.
- Wang, Li, et al. “Prevalence and Intensity of Persistent
Post-Surgical Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.” British Journal of
Anaesthesia, vol. 125, no. 3, 2020, pp. 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.088.
- Elshanbary, Alaa Ahmed, et al. “Efficacy and Safety of Pectoral Nerve
Block (Pecs) Compared with Control, Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae
Plane Block, and Local Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer
Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” The Clinical
Journal of Pain, vol. 37, no. 12, 2021, pp. 925–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000985.
- Saleh, Ramy Mousa, et al. “Comparison between Preemptive Erector
Spinae Plane Block versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Postoperative
Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A
Randomized Clinical Trial.” Ain Shams Medical Journal, vol. 76,
no. 1, 2025, pp. 74–85. https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2025.332729.1331.
- Gad, Mona, et al. “A Superiority Study of the Analgesic Efficacy of
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plain Block Compared to Serratus
Anterior Plain Block Using Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone for Modified
Radical Mastectomy.” Research and Opinion in Anesthesia &
Intensive Care, vol. 10, no. 4, 2023, pp. 296–304. https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_33_23.
- Saadawi, Mohammed, et al. “Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Narrative
Review with Systematic Analysis of the Evidence Pertaining to Clinical
Indications and Alternative Truncal Blocks.” Journal of Clinical
Anesthesia, vol. 68, 2021, article 110063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063.
- Leong, R. W., et al. “Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for
Analgesia in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.”
Anaesthesia, vol. 76, no. 3, 2021, pp. 404–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15164.
- Zhang, Ying, et al. “Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae
Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis.” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 21, 2021, article 59.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x.
- Huang, Wei, et al. “Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative
Analgesia in Breast and Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 66, 2020,
article 109900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109900.
- Swisher, Matthew W., et al. “Erector Spinae Plane versus
Paravertebral Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia after Breast
Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” Regional Anesthesia &
Pain Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, 2020, pp. 260–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-101013.
- Schnabel, Alexander, et al. “Erector Spinae Plane Block for
Postoperative Pain.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
no. 10, 2023, article CD013763. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.
- Elshal, Mamdouh Mahmoud, et al. “Efficacy of Adding Dexmedetomidine
as Adjuvant with Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane
Block for Post Thoracotomy Pain: Randomized Controlled Study.”
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 37, no. 1, 2021, pp.
425–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2021.1975973.
- Wang, Yi-han, et al. “Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine for
Erector Spinae Plane Block after Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A
Randomized Controlled Trial.” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,
vol. 23, 2022, article 235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05198-9.
- Abu El Hassan, Sawsan H. A., et al. “Comparative Study between
Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Alone in Erector Spinae
Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control of Posterior Lumbosacral
Spine Fixation Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Drug
Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 18, 2024, pp. 351–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S444485.
- Janwe, Kiran, et al. “A Study of Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine vs
Bupivacaine Alone in Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-Operative Pain
Control of Spine Fixation Surgeries.” European Journal of
Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 6, 2024, pp. 648–53.
- Li, Qian, et al. “Dexmedetomidine with Different Concentrations Added
to Local Anesthetics in Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Meta-Analysis of
Randomized Controlled Trials.” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 11,
2024, article 1326566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1326566.
- Wang, Xunxun, et al. “The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae
Plane Block Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in
Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled
Trial.” Pain and Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, pp. 475–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00234-9.
- Azra Nishat, et al.. “Dose–Timing Effects of Ascorbic Acid on
Dihydroartemisinin Efficacy.” Journal of Experimental &
Integrative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, 2026, pp. 25–28,
- Lally, Komal, et al. “Evaluation of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to
Levobupivacaine in Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative
Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A
Prospective Randomised Study.” Journal of Current Oncology,
vol. 8, no. 1, 2025, pp. 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/25898892251367084.
- Ahmed Abou El-Magd, Tark Ahmed Mahmoud, et al. “Dexmedetomidine
versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Fascia Iliaca Block
in Knee Arthroscopy for Postoperative Pain.” QJM: An International
Journal of Medicine, vol. 117, suppl. 1, 2024, abstract
hcae070.048. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.048.
- Jiao, Bo, et al. “Opioid-Sparing Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Erector
Spinae Plane Block for Adult Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis.” Pain Practice, vol. 22, no. 3, 2022,
pp. 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13091.
- Rinaldo Bellomo, et al.. “Biomarker-Integrated Precision Diagnostics
for Early Detection of Septic Acute Kidney Injury.” Journal of
Experimental & Integrative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, 2026, pp.
17–24.
How to cite:
Ayesha Siddiqa, Muzammil Hussain. Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Modified Radical Mastectomy Using Erector Spinae Plane Block with Bupivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine versus Bupivacaine Alone. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 2034-2043.
Publication History
-
Received: 11/05/2026
-
Accepted: 21/09/2026
-
Published: 15/10/2026
Copyright © 2026, Ayesha Siddiqa, Muzammil Hussain. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).