Abstract
Pain associated with local anesthetic (LA) injections, including needle penetration and solution deposition, contributes to dental anxiety and reluctance to undergo dental treatment. Topical anesthetics are widely applied before injection to reduce procedural discomfort, although their relative effectiveness varies with the agent, formulation, concentration, application time, and injection site. This study compared the effectiveness of 20% benzocaine gel and 2% lignocaine gel in reducing pain during needle penetration and subsequent local anesthetic deposition in dental procedures. A non-randomized, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, from March to July 2026. A total of 102 adults aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were included, with 51 participants receiving 20% benzocaine gel (Group A) and 51 receiving 2% lignocaine gel (Group B). Topical preparations were applied before standardized infiltration with an injectable local anesthetic solution. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Wong–Baker FACES Scale (WBS) at both needle insertion and LA solution deposition, as reported in the study tables. Compared with the lignocaine group, the benzocaine group had lower mean VAS scores during needle insertion (1.12 ± 0.84 versus 2.85 ± 1.42) and LA deposition (1.86 ± 1.10 versus 3.41 ± 1.68). Wong–Baker FACES scores were also lower at needle insertion (0.94 ± 0.76 versus 2.61 ± 1.35) and solution deposition (1.65 ± 0.98 versus 3.18 ± 1.54); all four reported between-group comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Under the conditions of this single-center, non-randomized study, 20% benzocaine gel was associated with lower needle-puncture and LA-deposition pain scores than 2% lignocaine gel. Randomized studies using documented allocation procedures and standardized pain measurements are warranted to confirm the comparative effectiveness and broader applicability of these findings.
Keywords: benzocaine; lignocaine; local anesthesia; needle-puncture pain; topical anesthetic gel; dental extraction; infiltration anesthesia
Abstract
Pain associated with local anesthetic (LA) injections, including needle penetration and solution deposition, contributes to dental anxiety and reluctance to undergo dental treatment. Topical anesthetics are widely applied before injection to reduce procedural discomfort, although their relative effectiveness varies with the agent, formulation, concentration, application time, and injection site. This study compared the effectiveness of 20% benzocaine gel and 2% lignocaine gel in reducing pain during needle penetration and subsequent local anesthetic deposition in dental procedures. A non-randomized, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, from March to July 2026. A total of 102 adults aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were included, with 51 participants receiving 20% benzocaine gel (Group A) and 51 receiving 2% lignocaine gel (Group B). Topical preparations were applied before standardized infiltration with an injectable local anesthetic solution. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Wong–Baker FACES Scale (WBS) at both needle insertion and LA solution deposition, as reported in the study tables. Compared with the lignocaine group, the benzocaine group had lower mean VAS scores during needle insertion (1.12 ± 0.84 versus 2.85 ± 1.42) and LA deposition (1.86 ± 1.10 versus 3.41 ± 1.68). Wong–Baker FACES scores were also lower at needle insertion (0.94 ± 0.76 versus 2.61 ± 1.35) and solution deposition (1.65 ± 0.98 versus 3.18 ± 1.54); all four reported between-group comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Under the conditions of this single-center, non-randomized study, 20% benzocaine gel was associated with lower needle-puncture and LA-deposition pain scores than 2% lignocaine gel. Randomized studies using documented allocation procedures and standardized pain measurements are warranted to confirm the comparative effectiveness and broader applicability of these findings.
Keywords: benzocaine; lignocaine; local anesthesia; needle-puncture pain; topical anesthetic gel; dental extraction; infiltration anesthesia
References
- de Freiras, Guilherme Camponogara, et al. “Efficacy of Benzocaine 20%
Topical Anesthetic Compared to Placebo Prior to Administration of Local
Anesthesia in the Oral Cavity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.”
Anesthesia Progress, vol. 62, no. 2, 2015, pp. 46–50.
- Kumar, Umesh, et al. “Buccal versus Buccal Palatal Infiltration for
Pulpal Anesthesia Using 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine: A Randomized
Controlled Trial.” Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial
Research, vol. 14, no. 2, 2024, pp. 205–210.
- Righes, Danielle Zorzo, et al. “The Efectiveness of Topical
Anesthesia on Pain during Oral Injections—A Randomized Clinical Trial.”
Current Challenges in Dentistry: Theory and Clinical Practice,
Seven Editora, 2024, ch. 21.
- Shimoda, Hajime, et al. “Transient Asystole Associated with Vasovagal
Reflex in an Oral Surgery Patient: A Case Report.” SAGE Open Medical
Case Reports, vol. 11, 2023, article 2050313X221146019.
- Abbasi, Hira, et al. “Cryoanesthesia with Ethyl Chloride Spray versus
5% Lidocaine Gel in Alleviating Oral Local Anesthetic Injection Pain for
Buccal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Clinical (Controlled) Trial.”
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects,
vol. 17, no. 1, 2023, pp. 40–46.
- Tani, Ryouji, et al. “Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Tape
for Topical Anesthesia of the Oral Mucosa: A Preliminary Controlled
Trial.” Dentistry Journal, vol. 11, no. 12, 2023, article
276.
- “Visual Analogue Scale.” Yale Assessment Module Training,
Yale University, https://assessment-module.yale.edu/im-palliative/visual-analogue-scale.
Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
- Bhalla, Jasdev, et al. “Effect of Time on Clinical Efficacy of
Topical Anesthesia.” Anesthesia Progress, vol. 56, no. 2, 2009,
pp. 36–41.
- “Pain.” POD-NMD, https://pod-nmd.org/assessment/pain/. Accessed 12 Oct.
2026.
- Maia, F. P. A., et al. “Does the Use of Topical Anesthetics Reduce
the Perception of Pain during Needle Puncture and Anesthetic
Infiltration? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized
Controlled Trials.” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, vol. 51, no. 3, 2022, pp. 412–425.
- Fukayama, Haruhisa, et al. “Comparison of Topical Anesthesia of 20%
Benzocaine and 60% Lidocaine Gel.” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral
Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 94, no. 2, 2002,
pp. 157–161.
- Franz-Montan, Michelle, et al. “Liposomal Delivery System for Topical
Anaesthesia of the Palatal Mucosa.” British Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 50, no. 1, 2012, pp. 60–64.
- Carr, M. P., and J. E. Horton. “Evaluation of a Transoral Delivery
System for Topical Anesthesia.” The Journal of the American Dental
Association, vol. 132, no. 12, 2001, pp. 1714–19.
- Parirokh, Masoud, et al. “Effect of Topical Anesthesia on Pain during
Infiltration Injection and Success of Anesthesia for Maxillary Central
Incisors.” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 12, 2012, pp.
1553–1556.
- Lee, Shelly, et al. “Anesthetic Efficacy of the Anterior Middle
Superior Alveolar (AMSA) Injection.” Anesthesia Progress, vol.
51, no. 3, 2004, pp. 80–89.
- Lawaty, Ingrid, et al. “A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind
Comparison of 2% Mepivacaine with 1:20,000 Levonordefrin versus 2%
Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Maxillary Infiltrations.”
Anesthesia Progress, vol. 57, no. 4, 2010, pp. 139–144.
- Nair, Manisha, and Deepa Gurunathan. “Comparative Evaluation of the
Efficacy of Two Anesthetic Gels (2% Lignocaine and 20% Benzocaine) in
Reducing Pain during Administration of Local Anesthesia—A Randomized
Controlled Trial.” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical
Pharmacology, vol. 35, no. 1, 2019, pp. 65–69.
- Karkoutly, Mawia, et al. “Efficacy of Topical Anesthetics of
Lidocaine, Benzocaine, and EMLA in Reducing Pain during Inferior
Alveolar Nerve Block in Schoolchildren: A Randomized Controlled Trial.”
BDJ Open, vol. 10, 2024, article 87.
- Vickers, E. R., and A. Punnia-Moorthy. “A Clinical Evaluation of
Three Topical Anaesthetic Agents.” Australian Dental Journal,
vol. 37, no. 4, 1992, pp. 266–270.
- Rehman, Nurain, and Samir Riaz Qazi. “Efficacy of Topical Benzocaine
in Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Anesthesia
Progress, vol. 66, no. 1, 2019, pp. 24–29.
- Daly, Sinead, et al. “Randomised Controlled Trial of a Microneedle
Patch with a Topical Anaesthetic for Relieving the Pain of Dental
Injections.” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 107, 2021, article
103617.
- Joshi, Sagar, et al. “DentalVibe Reduces Pain during the
Administration of Local Anesthetic Injection in Comparison to 2%
Lignocaine Gel: Results from a Clinical Study.” Journal of Dental
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 41–47.
- Havale, Raghavendra, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Pain
Perception Following Topical Application of Clove Oil, Betel Leaf
Extract, Lignocaine Gel, and Ice Prior to Intraoral Injection in
Children Aged 6–10 Years: A Randomized Control Study.” Journal of
Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 21, no. 4, 2021, pp.
329–336.
- Amrollahi, Narjes, et al. “Effect of Pre-Cooling on Pain Associated
with Dental Injections in Children: A Systematic Review.” Journal of
Evidence-Based Dental Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, 2021, article
101588.
How to cite:
Muhammad Usama, Abid Ashar, Malik Ali Hassan Sajid, Muhammad Asad Hayat. Comparative Effectiveness of 20% Benzocaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Topical Gel in Reducing Needle-Puncture Pain During Local Anesthetic Infiltration. Revista Cultura Científica, 2026 Issue 24. pg. 1909-1919.
Publication History
-
Received: 25/07/2026
-
Accepted: 28/09/2026
-
Published: 15/10/2026
Copyright © 2026, Muhammad Usama, Abid Ashar, Malik Ali Hassan Sajid, Muhammad Asad Hayat. Published by Revista Cultura Científica. This article is published as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).